Thursday, March 10, 2011

Wisconsin, Walker’s Watch: Unemployment Down 7.4% Public Sector Jobs Climb, Union Continues to Fight On as Relevancy Wanes


One of many Wisconsin Union Protesters - Image: SodaHead.com

Wisconsin: Unemployment dropped in February to 7.4%, the lowest since January 2010, under Governor Walker’s administration, while Democrats and Public Employee Unions continue to protest in Madison, WI. The hubbub yesterday (politely put), was over the Republican Legislature, in Committee, separating the language specific to reducing collective bargain for public unions in the budget bill, and then going to the floor for a vote – where it passed. (AP) According to the AP report, there were upwards to 7,000 protestors at the State Capital – 7,000. The 14 Wisconsin Senate Democrats are still “in hiding” in neighboring Illinois, and are calling foul – threatening to return to Madison WI, where they might resume the work they were hired to do. Polling, at this point in time, is with the public employees union, as millions have been poured into the state in the form of television and radio ads by both sides (Union and Republican).

However, would that poll be in favor of the public union if it was understood exactly what the contracts contained? Public Employee unions, with exceptions for those who are employed in dangerous fields (i.e. police and firefighters) are somewhat ridiculous, in an age where the federal government regulates everything in the workforce through a variety of federal laws.
Wisconsin’s law does not affect: steel workers, or unfortunately the UAW, nor any other public sector union, nor does it affect any public unions in any other states (although most of the other 49 are now considering a Walker move - including Massachusetts!)

Although the media is making it appear as though the “Republicans” in the Wisconsin government, from the Governor down through the legislature are attempting to strip unions nationwide of rights, the fact is they are limiting collective bargaining for public employee unions, not stripping all rights, and allowing teachers to choose between joining the union or not. At the moment, public schools teachers are forced to join a union, and opt outs in some states are possible, with a “fee” paid by the prospective teacher, in order to keep out of the union. In addition, once told there is a nominal fee ($500), one is told that if one opts not to join the union, one might feel the pressure of being ostracized by the union teachers. So much for a free country. In Wisconsin, prospective teachers are then free to make the choice, with this legislation.

Rarely, if ever, quoted here, Conservative Pundit, Ann Coulter, has a column this week regarding the Wisconsin brouhaha, which, if ads were run based on Coulter’s column, one would bet the residents of Wisconsin would poll in favor of the Governor, the Republicans in the Senate, and anyone else who would stop the excesses of what is known as a public union. Coulter, when one puts aside the dripping sarcasm (which can be amusing, deepening upon the subject), is impeccably researched: From www.anncoulter.com:


“Because of the insane union contracts in Wisconsin, one Madison bus driver, John E. Nelson, was able to make $159,000 in 2009 -- about $100,000 of which in overtime pay. Jackie Gleason didn't make that much playing bus driver Ralph Kramden on "The Honeymooners." Seven bus drivers took home more than $100,000 that year.

When asked about the outrageous overtime pay for bus drivers -- totaling $1.94 million in 2009 alone -- Transit and Parking Commission Chairman Gary Poulson said: "That's the contract."

It's ludicrous to suggest that these union contracts were fairly bargained. Only one side was at the negotiating table. Ordinary people with jobs were not at the meetings where public sector compensation was discussed”
(read the entire article here).


Meanwhile, the 14 Democrats hiding out in Wisconsin, are vowing (with help from their friends at the SEIU, to have the Republican Senators and the Governor recalled. They are in the process of rushing back, three weeks after they first learned there would be a vote, and refused to return, some Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin suggesting that the Unions have more sway over when they come or go, than those Senators on the proverbial lam.

It is, to be blunt, a cruel joke on the people of Wisconsin, it is further, a cruel joke on those teachers and employees involved in the public unions, that there possibly “preferred Senators” are not in the fray fighting for their “rights” to filch every nickel and dime out of the taxpayers in Wisconsin, especially now, when they have learned there are new public sector employees, able to pay taxes and support the “contracts” that place bus drivers on a pay scale above the local MD’s. (Who, with the costs of regulation, malpractice insurance for self and staff, and overhead, make less per hour than say, the local veterinarian.)

While SEIU members from across the nation have flooded into Wisconsin to protest (no those are not all Wisconsin Teachers in that Capitol building), one has to ask why it is so important for this particular organization to fight tooth, nail and ad campaigns against union restructuring of this nature. One must only follow the money trail; 27 Million Dollars spent on electing one man, Barack Obama, president. FEC via CNSnews. With the option on the table in Wisconsin of members being able to choose between joining or not joining the public employees union, the SEIU must fear that their popularity is not all that – and those who have a choice, will opt out, leaving them short of cash, which is short of influence in the upcoming elections.

There are not unions that protect employees who work in hazardous situations, or who are working in conditions such as those who endured the horrors of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, (well worth reading for perspective) at the turn of the century. Although this tragedy produced unions for workers rights, specifically the IGLWU (which is now defunct), it bears repeating that throughout the coming decades legislation was passed, departments formed, and workers rights were given a place in the laws of the United States. This Federal action, reduced the need for unions, other than as a body to ensure those with little to no education would be able to receive benefits and maintain safe working environment. Unions, therefore, are in place for those who are perceived as being unable to fend for themselves, ensuring employees a living wage, and safe working conditions, and benefits that might equal those in the “shops” management.

Teachers, and bus drivers who pull down six figure salaries, (plus overtime), with the help of collective bargaining, simply defies logic.

It remains to be seen how this will all play out, however, if one is fond of placing a bet or two, one might put their wager on the Governors, the Mayors, and those in a position of having to balance a budget, by eliminating excesses granted by public (emphasis – public) employee unions, rather than the union bosses who are in the “trenches” fighting for the “teachers” while pulling down similar salaries for being professional rabble-rousers.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

how dumb do you have to be to think that Walker, in office a little over 2 months, has anything to do with WI's UE rate dropping?

Um, hello, UE rates dropped nationwide.

You T-Partiers are mental lightweights and wholly pathetic.

Anonymous said...

Here's a pro-union Reagan video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orwN4WKhriw

and here's Reagan on unions:

"Collective bargaining in the years since has played a major role in America’s economic miracle. Unions represent some of the freest institutions in this land. There are few finer examples of participatory democracy to be found anywhere."

there's more, if you dare to expand your limited world: http://foxtrot-echo.blogspot.com/2011/03/ronald-reagan-on-unions-and-collective.html

Seriously, I used to be like you, a conservative, even named a dog Reagan back in the 80's. So I know how shallow and wrong your ideas are. Read more. Travel more. Ideally to Europe. Hate less. Meet new people. You can change. I did.

But honestly, people who haven't realized just how retarded and hateful conservatives are by now, well, there probably is no hope for you. You are just very dumb, or blinded by hate, racism, homophobia or other irrational fears, all of which usually grow out of irrational beliefs in fairy gods in the sky.

Anonymous said...

ok, I read some of your other posts, and you do write well and you're probably no dummy, and maybe not any of the other things I said, a southern racist, homophobic, bible thumper.

You're probably just confused. :P

Tina Hemond said...

Hello P: I take it you’re the anonymous poster on Union and Health Care Opinion Pieces – the key word being opinion – A) Although the UE rate dropped nationwide it was more significant in States where there was a new administration or a more business friendly approach – see Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/lau/ - I won’t go into the fact that 26 states receive extended unemployment benefits the balance – those unemployed are no longer counted.

Difference on unions: public versus private - very simple


Reagan on Unions – Fired the Air Traffic Controllers – enough said

Here’s the deal on Education in Massachusetts and the 11 other states that take part in the whole Race to the Top – Reading scores were just released by the Dept. Of Education.

One thing that really amazes me – when one disagrees with one’s opinion – and one happens to be from the left of center – (and younger mind you) –out comes the vitriol and hate and “authority of education” – which is telling - politely agree to disagree and link it, debate politely and be a tad civil – it’s more European – shame on you – where and when were you educated?

I believe the confusion lies in your inability to look at both sides of any issue, until one has the ability to do so, study and then come to a conclusion; one is incapable of civil and reasoned debate.

I am glad to see you’re also clairvoyant.

Neither Racist, nor any of the other things you derived from the word Conservative and my point of view – which obviously varies from yours – to be fair, you might find we agree on more than one issue, it is just that you have to watch, and listen to all sides of an argument (and more than one news source mind you) prior to making an informed decision on any subject.
(to be continued)

Tina Hemond said...

Answering your comments under Maine:

The Health Care Reform Act (nationally) was deemed constitutional by two federal judges, for two different reasons – and is now being appealed, it will go to the Supreme Court – it has little to do with the political point of view of a Justice, rather it has more to do with the darn Constitution, and the fact that those who wrote the Bill in Haste, neglected to include a severability clause – meaning that if one piece of the legislation is deemed Unconstitutional the entire piece is invalid.

Massachusetts Health Care is the largest part of the budget – and is considerably in the red, where you find it a model, I find if a fiscal disaster – understanding that individuals do need affordable Health Care (I worked in the industry for several years) there are gaps that are in the Mass. Plan, which are glaring – for example if one cannot afford the health care offered by private carriers or Commonwealth Care – one is allowed to file for an exemption – if one is single and has little overhead, one can most likely afford the Commonwealth plan, however, others – specifically families in the State are suffering and continue to be unable to afford either – check out the waivers that are granted (much like the waivers being given to Unions, large corporations and now States on the Federal level)

Just for your edification: Born and raised in Western Mass (although gather educated in the find public schools prior to the 1970’s – which explains a lot) – Elms College is one of the better private colleges – if you stepped onto the campus, you would find that for the most part it has a more liberal bent than say UMass – on Dr. Fleitman – or any doctor for that matter – a large staff and or multiple positions do not make one with an MD rich – once they have finished paying off all of their overhead including, mind you massive insurance premiums – they make less than my dogs vet – I had one doctor, who had left private practice for economic reasons, share with me the insanity of his overhead – it was to the point where this valuable asset to the community could not afford to stay in a practice in Massachusetts – so left. Dr. Fleitman is a patriot, he at least got up and ran, putting his “money machine” on hold so that he could give his time to the community at large – when one runs for office, regardless of party, one is doing more than the “rest of us” who sit back and do little more than vote.

The South – if you care to look at those nationwide test scores, you’d be surprised to find that there is little difference between states – except for Wisconsin, which is dismally low.

The most racists State in the nation – Massachusetts.
I’ve lived elsewhere; I know whereof I speak – study what took place when they tried to force b using back in the 1960’s 1970’s - in the 1960’s.

What makes my blood boil is assumptions by those who are touting a party line, instead of actually expressing their own opinion and doing so, again with vitriol and little else.

Tina Hemond


Amazon Picks

Massachusetts Conservative Feminist - Degrees of Moderation and Sanity Headline Animator

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Map

Contact Me:

Your Name
Your Email Address
Subject
Message