In September, when Sarah Palin was introduced to the nation as the Republican V.P. nominee, the press and the public entered into a love-hate relationship that transcended politics. She was hailed by conservatives, who had followed the Alaskan Governors’ career, as a stalwart conservative who was a breath of fresh air that the party desperately needed. She connected with “the people” at a personal level, a rarity for politicians. On the other hand, the press, and those in the Republican Party who would maintain the status quo, reviled her as less-than intelligent, a “bimbo” who was out-of-touch with mainstream values. The vitriolic reporting drove Palin to a level of celebrity status over night – from false allegations about her youngest child that made daily newspapers read like the worst tabloids. There was a never ending litany of complaints regarding her hair, her accent, her cloths, her religion, ad nausea – There were literally hundreds of negative “Sarah Palin - Google News Alerts” daily – up until November 5th.
One has to ask – What gives? From the San Francisco Chronicle’s Debra Saunder’s defense of Palin against anonymous campaign leaks to the Boston Globe’s Jeff Jacoby article on Palin’s Political Potential the mood has changed a bit post November 4. There continue to be articles and blogs from the left that recycle, the “Palin as Inept” theory - Democrat Susan Estrich, writing in the Hartford Currant, dissects the choice of Palin as a V.P. pick noting: “The fact that anyone could believe a candidate for vice president was capable of being that ignorant is enough. and going on to rehash the Couric interview. One cannot fail to see the difference between those articles written by journalists and those written by partisan commentators. The difference: Palin no longer represents a short-term threat to Obama, but to another, yet unnamed Democrat in the future.
Two other women, who had reached high in national politics, Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton, were subject to more intense scrutiny than their male counterparts, and scrutiny that had little to do with issues – rather the fact that they were women. Although, one would expect that a twenty-four year gap between vice-presidential and presidential candidates that just happened to be women, would have changed the rhetoric – it did not – in fact: “We’ve come a long way, baby”, should be “We’ve got a long way to go”. Clinton was treated to a review of her marriage, her pantsuits, her laugh and her cleavage; which was enough to drive conservatives to her defense, however, transparently sexist as the treatment Clinton received, nothing compared to the evisceration of Palin.
In this past contest, both Vice Presidential Candidates gave enough material to the press to be equally criticized, yet, Biden received a virtual pass. One might be inclined to believe that the pass given to Biden was partisan, however, examining article after article, it was clear that clothing, hair, children, and other feminine attributes took center stage – never the issues - sexism, plain and simple.
In retrospect, both Clinton and Plain although subject to unusual scathing from the press and from members of their own party, came through standing up and standing tall – taking the punches better than many of their male peers may have. It speaks volumes. Some may feel that the “glass ceiling” has become a “cement ceiling” – after all, what woman would want to go through what these two patriots have? One has to believe that both women have inspired, through their strength and ability to weather the “political storm”, others who will shortly follow in their footsteps. It is not that “our time has come”, rather it is that the notion that women are unable to grasp the brass ring, is no longer valid. Palin, who took the brunt of it, a working mother, a Governor, whose political future is now being trumpeted by those within her party as well as those in the press, has proven that women can aspire to and achieve anything. Love her or hate her, depending upon one’s political affiliation, she is owed a debt of gratitude from all women and parents who have daughters. Sexism was used to distract the general public for political gain. It was evident, and women have taken note. Will sexism be used again in politics and succeed? That question remains - hopefully, because of women like Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, the nation will not have to wait another twenty four years before learning the answer.
Opinion and Commentary on state, regional and national news articles from a conservative feminist point of view expressed and written by conservative moderate: Tina Hemond
Monday, November 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
It's good timing for you to have written on this subject today ... as just this morning ... as I was waking to my cup of coffee and a splash of Fox & Friends, it was reported that Newt Gingrich has taken Gov. Palin down a notch, asserting that she would not become the party’s leader, as some have predicted.
“I think that she is going to be a significant player,” said Gingrich during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation”. “But she’s going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. She’s not going to be the de facto leader.”
Gingrich is actually out there diverting media attention away from Palin and to other governors such as Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and Utah Gov. John Huntsman (R).
WTF? I was absolutely stunned and taken aback by these comments ... especially for Gingrich, whom I've always had the utmost respect for ... They used this woman ... and then when they were finished, they threw her under the bus ... and now they're driving the bus right over top of her.
I think that Palin and Clinton did open some doors to make it easier for another woman, maybe one of them (Prefferably Palin).
As far as sexism, it clearly still exists but the reality is that it, like racism will never likely be completely eradicated. There will always be divisive people. Fortunately though, I have a young daughter, women ahve made great strides. My daughter is being raised to believe she can do anything.
Isn't it especially troubling that much of the sexism Palin experienced came from women?
I really expected more.
I hope women r more supportive and less catty in the future.
Thanks for the great post, you are such a treat!
It's amusing that you say that Sarah Palin has taken the "brunt" of the sexism. She's been on the national scene for all of two-and-a-half months. Clinton's been fielding sexism from conservatives for sixteen years. There's no comparison between these two candidates. Clinton is a serious individual who exudes competence, and Palin is vapid and inarticulate. To write the criticism of Sarah Palin off as mere "sexism" is to exist in a state of complete denial.
Say Mr. DIvide, welcome back ... but be careful, as nothing could be further from the truth ... without any long-term history of this blog, you have no idea how much Tina has stated such ... in regards to Senator Clinton that is. The main difference here is the fact that Palin was taking hits from all sides ... and that in, and of itself, justifies her spot on analogy.
Was Hillary Clinton not "taking hits from all sides"?
Hi Jimmy, Chuck, Red & Merge,
Red, Women are just like men, petty and backstabbing - My feeling is that women should not support a candidate based on gender, however, they should be aware of sexism and how it affects all women - to be honest, it has gone by the wayside - the entire issue of feminism has been pushed aside - how often do you hear anyone (media or otherwise) complain about the wage discrepancy that exists between the genders? That is what has been lost - Merge, Palin got slammed, she had it much worse than Clinton, and trust me, I watched Clinton because I supported her - so, just so you follow my logic: first it was Huckabee (his governing of Arkansas - that was the main attraction), second came Clinton, when it was a choice between Clinton, Obama and McCain, she seemed to be strongest on defense, national security and domestic issues - she had the relevant experience, but.. that was put to rest by endless pantsuit, hair and makeup jokes - she did not receive any passes. I held my nose to vote for McCain because I felt that Obama did not best represent my political ideology. McCain was just a bit higher up on the rung than Obama. Go figure, sometimes Moderate, means just that - I cross the aisle when I feel it is in the best interest of my country. Here's the deal: no one candidate can appeal to every one on every single issue - smart voters are capable of looking at the bigger picture. On Palin, just because you had not heard of her, did not mean others who follow politics 24/7 did not - get used to Palin, she's not going anywhere for some time - as to the role she'll play, no-one is able to determine that yet.
... Well put Tina!
... all I was eluding to, Mr. Divide, was for your need to follow the blog and look at the big picture before making such critical remarks.
If issues of feminism have been "pushed aside", then it is because the GOP has dominated politics for the last eight years. I've been entertained over the last couple of months to see all the new "conservative feminists" coming out of the woodwork. They've never support reproductive rights, or equal pay for equal work... and they have never had anything to say about the subservient role women play in most Christian sects. Yet somehow...because they love Sarah Palin, they are now "feminists".
I've read a lot of comments and posts by Palin supporters, and they almost all cry "sexism" when it comes to the criticism she has earned on the national scene. But the reality is that the vast majority of political attacks on her have had nothing to do with her gender. They have to do with her inability to offer substance on any issue at the national or international levels.
Sure, I'll get used to her. She has plenty of entertainment value. I hope that the GOP picks her as the nominee in 2012.
Merge - I have to say, your last comment inspired an entire post. The issue of conservative feminism vis a vis Palin and the GOP needed broader clarification in a rebuttal. Thank you, quite inspirational.
Post a Comment