Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Chris Christie, NJ Governor, Get’s it Right – Budget That the U.S. Congress, Senate and the President should follow.

New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie gave the State’s budget address yesterday, taking New Jersey on the path to fiscal responsibility and stating his case for sacrifice, ending bloated pensions, and reducing every single department. In addition, Christie noted that the State of New Jersey can’t do it alone, that all towns and municipalities must do the same in order to get the job done. The video of his address is shown below – what can be seen is that Christie gets “it” – it would be the overburdened tax payer, the fact that taxing businesses to death results in job losses, the fact that there is plenty of fat to be trimmed from State Budgets, and that going bankrupt is not an option.

One has to consider that the Federal government has embarked upon a mad spending spree, the likes of which may be of historical proportions; legislation that has passed in the last year, has led to an insurmountable debt, that continues to grow, despite public outcry and political consequence. The Obama administration and like minded members of Congress are prepared to saddle Taxpayers with increased debt (meaning increased taxes across the board) in order to continue to legislate huge government reforms that include expanded bureaucracy. They are either punch drunk with power, ideologically challenged, or more to the point, plain stupid. In any event, those that are currently driving their Party members to vote for massive spending bills, including and specifically the Health Care Reform Bill, are dooming their Party to obscurity.

Christie gets “it” – the people will drive the “machine” as they no longer feel they are being fairly represented. Taxing the people to the point of penury has been the norm in New Jersey, as well as Massachusetts and California, to name a few more states on the brink of bankruptcy. Should a State budget fail, where will the money come from? Certainly not the Federal government which is currently stretched to the limit, adding trillion upon trillions of dollars to its own deficit – with a shrinking tax base (unemployment and bailing businesses) – sooner than later, with the present course, there will be nothing available to bail out these States that consistently depend on what they can get from “Washington”.

Will it be painful, yes, obviously, Christie makes that quite clear, but will it work to trim the fat, and make for a government that better serves the people – not those who would stand to represent or work for those who represent the people (list includes all State employees). Would the federal government have the courage and the intelligence to reverse a years’ worth of damage and get our house in order!
A full text of Christies speech is available here at The Trentonian. Some excerpts follow:



"Today, we begin doing what we promised we would do. The defenders of the status quo have already begun to yell and scream. They will try to demonize me. They will seek to divide us rather than unite us. But even they know in their hearts, if not yet in their minds it is time for a change.

Never forget, some of those shouting the loudest are the architects of the disaster we are now suffering. Do we really want another decade of economic failure? No, this spring it is time to clear away the underbrush to make room for growth.

So, today, we stop sweeping problems under the rug. We will not hide our problems until another day. And we are certainly not increasing the tax burden we place upon our people.

Today, we are taking necessary and decisive action to reduce state spending and reform state government. The problems we have hidden for twenty years are evident for all to see. The day of reckoning has arrived.

Some are saying, by their choice of policies, that we should descend further into debt and deficit, and risk driving more people out of the state with "temporary" tax increases that always turn out to be permanent.

I say we must face up to our responsibility:

— Cut government spending and end public union excesses that we can no longer afford;

— Reform government to cost less and operate better;

— And restore some sense of balance to the obligations we take on -- so that in the future they are both sensible and sustainable.

In short, we can forge a new course. One that brings spending in line with revenues. One that attacks our problems directly so they are shrinking, not growing. And most importantly, one that lays the groundwork for a better tomorrow.
Therefore, our solutions must set a historic new course directly away from the failed tax and spend policies of the past.

In recent years, we have allowed the problem to become bigger through a series of one-time gimmicks that have worsened our situation.

This year, for example, some state employees will be given an 11% salary increase, at a cost of $300 million to the taxpayers, while many New Jerseyans are lucky to even have a job. Incredible.

$700 million in one-time revenues came in from granting amnesty to tax cheats in another gimmick that was used to paper over problems. As usual, our government spent it all in one year, and built that much more spending into the budget for this coming year, with no way to pay for it now or in the future.

So too were federal stimulus funds for education irresponsibly spent all in one year -- and then simply added into the budget, with no way to pay for it this year.
One reason is that some people who could leave New Jersey have left the state. A recent study documented this trend. It found that from 2004 to 2008, New Jersey experienced a net outflow of wealth of $70 billion.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you tax them, they will leave.

In the past two and one-half years, New Jersey's unemployment rate has more than doubled from 4.4% to 9.9% --. From below the national average to above the national average.

There is a cost to all this taxing and spending. It is costing us jobs.

That price is unacceptable. I want to put New Jersey back to work.

So today, as promised, I am proposing a new course -- an entirely different course.

My budget proposes to review state government from top to bottom, and bring it under control. My budget proposes that we reform the way New Jersey government operates; and that we demand reform from the local governments we fund as well.
$2.9 billion of the budget gap was closed by reforming programs to make them better and more efficient than ever before.

Every single department of state government will be reduced: Agriculture, down 24%; Banking, down 12%; Children and families, down 4%; Community affairs, down 35%; Corrections, down 7%; Environmental protection, down 2%; Education, down 8%; Health and senior services, down 6%; Human services, down 4%; Labor, down 6%; Law and public safety, down 7%; Military affairs, down 2%; The public advocate, down 25%. State, transportation and treasury, down 11, 3, and 39%, respectively.

Every department of state government has been asked to tighten its belt. And we will demand local governments do the same. We cannot and should not make state government shrink only to let local government expand.

$3 billion in savings results from recognizing that our pension system must be reformed before we can or should fund a broken, out of control system. The pension system has been so generous that it has created a flood of liabilities. From 2002 to 2008, pension payments to retirees grew 56%, triple the inflation rate. Our benefits are too rich, most public employees contribute too little, and the taxpayers have had enough -- enough of out of control pensions to public sector unions while they are losing their own jobs, enough of losing their homes, and then being told by the union bosses that they must pick up the tab for rich pensions at the same time."


Finally, someone who, from a state that at times may have made the Massachusetts Legislature blush (not quite), stands up to those who would continue on a train to nowhere, and offers the path to freedom. Kudos to Chris Christie for looking out for his constituents. Would that the Federal Government and states such as Massachusetts, New York, California et al, would do the same, not in year, but now, as the time for action is never past – it is before us.

Christie challenges teachers union on benefits

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Health Care Reform Before Congressional Budget Committee – How They Voted on Health Care Motions – The Details and the Disgust


An empty House Budget Committee Hearing Room - Image Rep. Spratt

As Obama’s extremely unpopular Health Care Reform bill has been pushed to the House, and members are being asked to sign onto a major overhaul of our Health Care System, sight unseen, the Budget Committee in hearings took a look at certain items thatmay or may not be included in the package. The Republican’s introduced several motions, all of which were summarily declined by the Democrat controlled Committee. These motions and how members voted are as follows:

1. Prevent Government from Interfering with Doctor-Patient Relationship
Mr. Hensarling moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, prohibit the use of comparative effectiveness research or other measures to restrict medical professionals from providing and/or prescribing the care they believe to be medically necessary.

Defeated: Straight Party Line

2. Put the Federal Government on a Sustainable Fiscal Path First
Mr. Campbell moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, delay the implementation of both legislative measures until Congress has enacted legislation to put the Federal budget and U.S. economy on a sustainable fiscal path.

Defeated: Straight Party Line

3. No Medicare Cuts to Pay for a New Entitlement
Mr. Ryan moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, prevent Medicare cuts from being use to offset or fund a new entitlement program, reduce new government spending in such legislation by that amount, and direct all Medicare savings to the Medicare program to make that program fiscally sustainable.

Defeated: With Two Democrats Voting Aye: Boyd, FL, and Edwards, TX

4. Prevent Government from Limiting Choice and Competition
Mrs. Lummis moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, prohibit the government from controlling health plan choices and restricting competition among health plans and delete any provision, including section 124 of H.R. 3590, that gives the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and a new Health Benefits Advisory Committee unprecedented power to create and change the requirements for “acceptable coverage.”

Defeated: Straight Party Line

5. Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions
Mr. Jordan moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide for legislative text that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, by adding the language of the amendment offered by Representative Bart Stupak, offered on November 11, 2009 and numbered as House Amendment 509 to H.R.3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, to prohibit federal funding of abortions.

Defeated: Democrats Voting Aye: Kaptur (OH), Berry (AR) & Langevin (RI)

6. No Raising Taxes During a Recession
Mr. Nunes moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, protect American jobs and families by striking tax increases and mandates in both legislative measures that would hinder job creation and reduce workers and families income during a period of high unemployment and economic weakness

Defeated: Edwards (TX) Voting Aye

7. Health Care Reform Must Bend the Cost Curve
Mr. Garrett moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, make the provisions of both legislative measures contingent upon the Centers on Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Office of the Actuary issuance of a report that such measures will not increase national health care expenditures or increase the federal commitment to health care, and that such measures will succeed in bending the “health care cost curve” downward by lowering the projection of such expenditures.

Defeated: Straight Party Line

8. Require Up-to-Date Estimate on Full Cost of Bill
Mr. Simpson moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request on behalf of the Committee that the Committee on Rules not make in order consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 or H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, until a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate of both measures relative to its March 2010 baseline, including estimates of the budget impact of authorization of appropriations in such measures, and the text of such reconciliation legislation are made available to Members and the public at least 72 hours before being considered on the House floor and that there be separate votes on each measure.

Defeated: Edwards (TX) voting Aye

9. No Raising Health Insurance Premiums
Mr. McHenry moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, ensure that the Federal mandates in both legislative measures do not cause an increase in projected health care insurance premiums.

Defeated: Edwards (TX) voting Aye

10. Eliminate New Bureaucracies Devoted to Expanding the Federal Government
Mr. Latta moves that the Committee on the Budget direct its Chairman to request, on behalf of the Committee, the rule to be reported by the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives for the consideration of the Reconciliation Act of 2010 provide that the legislative text to be included in that Reconciliation measure that amends H.R. 3590, the Senate-passed health care bill, eliminate the creation or expansion of government bureaucracies in such measures.

Defeated: Straight Party Line

Therefore, in the last week of the latest Deadline imposed by the President on the Congress to pass a bill that will ensure his Party’s defeat in 2010 and 2012, certain members in the budget committee, feel that there is no time to discuss options, that the American Taxpayer is more than capable of taking on more in this economy and that their Senior Citizens do not merit protection (although most of these members are eligible for social security, Medicare and Medicare Advantage, no data on who is actually receiving checks and or benefits). Apparently, a few, but very few, do understand that the nation is not ready to move forward with this particular bill, and although reform is essential, would prefer more of a bi-partisan effort, one where everyone’s ideas are brought to the table – and a well crafted bill can be produced. Listed below are the members, their state and their district. It is easy enough to send a note of thanks to those who have the courage to stand up for the American people (speaking to those Democrats that voted Aye on some extremely sensible Motions, while the others should be summarily thrown out with the bathwater – for playing party politics over the needs of their constituents. A note stating such might be in order.

Where to find the addresses: congress.org – contact your officials

The members of the Committee Include: (Designation by Party, State and Congressional District)

John Spratt, SC - Chairman (D-SC 5th)
Allyson Schwartz, PA - Vice Chair (D-PA 13th)
Marcy Kaptur, OH – (D-OH 9th)
Xavier Becerra, CA (D-CA 31st)
Lloyd Doggett, TX (D-TX 25th)
Earl Blumenauer, OR (D-OR 3rd)
Marion Berry, AR (D-AR 1st)
Allen Boyd, FL (D-FL 2nd)
James McGovern, MA (D-MA 3rd)
Niki Tsongas, MA (D-MA 5th)
Bob Etheridge, NC (D-NC 2nd)
Betty McCollum, MN (D-MN 4th)
Charlie Melancon, LA (D-LA 3rd)
John Yarmuth, KY (D-KY 3rd)
Rob Andrews, NJ I(D-NY 1st)
Rosa DeLauro, CT (D-CT 3rd)
Chet Edwards, TX (D-TX 17th)
Robert "Bobby" Scott, VA (D-VA 3rd)
Jim Langevin, RI (D-RI 2nd)
Rick Larsen, WA (D-WA 2nd)
Tim Bishop, NY (D-NY 1st)
Gwen Moore, WI (D-WI 4th)
Gerald Connolly, VA (D-VA 11th)
Kurt Schrader, OR (D-OR 5th
Paul Ryan, WI - Ranking Member (R-WI 1st)
Jeb Hensarling, TX - Vice Ranking Member (R-TX 5th)
Scott Garrett, NJ (R-NJ 5th)
Mario Diaz-Balart, FL (R-FL 21st)
Michael Simpson, ID (R-ID 2nd)
Patrick McHenry, NC (R-NC 10th)
Connie Mack, FL (R-FL 14th)
John Campbell, CA (R-CA 48th)
Jim Jordan, OH (R-OH 4th)
Devin Nunes, CA (R-CA 21st)
Robert Aderholt, AL (R-AL 4th)
Cynthia Lummis, WY (R-WY – At Large)
Steve Austria, OH (R-OH 7th)
Gregg Harper, MS (R-MS 3rd)
Robert E. Latta, OH (R-OH 5th

Monday, March 15, 2010

Texas Takes Lead in Revising Social Studies Curriculum - Pundits Cry “Right-Wing” Re-writing of History - Analysis

The Texas State Board of Education recently voted on new curriculum standards for the subject of “Social Studies” (previously known as History). The revisions are being hailed as a controversial revision of historyhowever, one must ask two question – have not changes to all curriculum been made over the years and who is responsible for making these changes?

When it comes to history, very few outside of the university level of a history major, truly understand that revisions have been made across the board for years, in order to frame a “message” rather than to teach about the past. Some professors believe that history is for the “elite” (those who have a minimum of a four-year degree), and that the “masses” (the “rest of the population”) would be overwhelmed if they were to learn the “truth” – it is also of note that most of these individuals are political “Progressives”. One need only look at a history book from 1955, to understand the broad changes that were made in the 1970’s forward. History morphed from a single subject to the broader social studies, which takes a deep look at how decisions made by some, directly impact society.

Anyone over a certain age (40) knows that history was taught to be dates and facts about the glory of the United States. There was little to no mention of women in history, with the notable exceptions. Additionally, culture was not addressed. With the design to address cultural and social issues as they relate to history, the changes made over the years have startled some, but for the most part, have gone unnoticed by the majority. The U.S. was studiously painted as a villain, and suddenly those who were lauded as heroes, were found to be evil incarnate (See Christopher Columbus in new textbooks).

The Texas State Board of education made some conscious decisions to tweak the textbooks to include some figures which have been pushed to the wayside, disclude others with whom they felt were not necessary, and on cultural issues, chose to ignore the musical form of “hip-hop”.

Some revisions are: (Texas Statesman:

Civil rights movement
• Among his recommended revisions was a reference to the changes and events that resulted from the movement, "including increased participation of minorities in the political process and unrealistic expectations for equal outcomes."
America is Exceptional
• "The section in the high school U.S. government standards will explore why American values are unique from those of other nations and touch on Alexis de Tocqueville's five values crucial to America's success as a democratic republic.
Words Matter
• In all grades, most references to "capitalism" were eliminated. The term has a negative connotation, said Ken Mercer, R-San Antonio. Instead, the U.S. economic system is defined throughout as a "free enterprise" system.
• The standards were once littered with references to the U.S. as a democracy. No more. In an early draft, the U.S became a "democratic republic" but now will be termed a "constitutional republic."
• American "imperialism" in an early draft of the high school U.S. history standards became "expansionism" because the original term projected an inaccurately negative view of American policy. The word "propaganda" will be stricken in reference to America's entry into World War I.
The Middle East
• High school world history students will be expected to "explain how Arab rejection of the State of Israel has led to ongoing conflict" and no longer will be asked to "explain the origins and impact of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on global politics".

All revisions will be available online here at the Texas Board of Education.

The hue and cry that has been raised is based on the premise that Texas holds sway over the nations text book manufactures, as the state purchase the largest percentage of text books nationwide. That said, most states can no longer afford to purchase new textbooks, and many cities, refuse to supply students with textbooks, as they may become “lost” and they are too expensive to replace – ergo no homework (May account for some higher than average drop-out rates).

As the President produces national standards for education that has the Commonwelath of Massachusetts up in arms, as too low, one has to wonder why the Texas Board of Education’s decision to change their curriculum, has been such a huge story – after all, Texas, along with other states, will be required to follow standardized material handed down by the U.S. Government – albeit, lower standards.

Some truths about history and historians: From Social Studies textbooks to Presidential biographies, history is, as one might say, in the eye of the beholder. Generally speaking these books are written by individuals how have a specific political point of view, rather than a scientific point of view. History should be approached as a science, whereby certain facts are affirmed through the written record, and similar studies such as archeology. It’s dry stuff, boring to the point of tears for many. However, that said, those Historians who write the biographies, will either place the subject in a grand light or make the subject appear to be the worst of villains, all based on an individual political perspective. How easy it is to write and leave out facts that may either enhance or detract from one’s subject or one’s “cause”. That is exactly what has happened over the years, and the Texas Board has done nothing more or less than any other “group” that has played fast and loose with the education of the general public.

From this perspective, textbooks should be tested for fact over opinion, and fact-checked to include all specifics of an historical event or personage. As to adding hip-hop culture into a textbook – from this perspective, the hip-hop culture has done nothing to elevate the nation, and if it were to be included should point out how it denigrates women, and has had little positive impact on society. That said most hip-hop is great on the dance floor – who doesn’t like rap? Once one gets through all the expletives, it’s music, an art-form of sorts, but the impact of “hip-hop” on our culture, has yet to be determined, it is “too new” from this perspective, to be “history”.

Amazon Picks

Massachusetts Conservative Feminist - Degrees of Moderation and Sanity Headline Animator

FEEDJIT Live Traffic Map

Contact Me:

Your Name
Your Email Address
Subject
Message