Glenn Beck -making the best of George Soros - image Static Business
There’s a lot of buzz about the aging, super wealthy, George Soros; those on the left find him to be some sort of guru, while those on the right view him as some sort of anti-Christ – so what’s the big deal? For one, George Soros has been making one Glenn Beck a whole lot of money – Beck, shock radio host turned patriotic television personality and book tour star, has most recently suggested that Soros’ followers are installed in the White House and that President Barack Obama may be in some sort of “danger”.
George Soros as Dr. Evil - photo credit spicey street irregulars
When looking at the grander scheme of things, Soros comes across as a perfect Dr. Evil, out to take over the world, sans a mini-me.
Is Soros’s fan base capable of assassinating a sitting president? Possibly - fan bases being what they are in the ever politically passionate reality television mind-set of middle-American. Just this past week, one frustrated fan of “Dancing with the Stars”, shot up his television set because Bristol Palin, daughter to 2012 predicated GOP Presidential Candidate, Sarah Palin, bested another celebrity for a final spot. It’s just a hop, skip and a jump from blowing up a television set, and blowing up a President in the scenario of a Soros-Dr. Evil Beck infested waters of the world of the “Boob Tube”.
Beck, one has to believe, truly loves this country, this nation, and has done due diligence in his research, and yet, there is something so intensely fanatical about Mr. Beck, he could be cast as the nemesis to Dr. Evil (Soros) in a blockbuster yet to be filmed. One has to hand it to Mr. Beck, he is more likable than Soros, more American (if there is such a thing anymore) and face
it, Soros makes a great target.
Is Soros crazy or just plain bored? Both! When reviewing his biography via discoverthenetworks.org Soros’ childhood was nothing to write home about. From Jewish origins in Nazi Occupied Hungary, his grandfather changed the family name in order to blend into the anti-Semitic society. Using tactics that so many did to survive the Holocaust, the family was separated in order to avoid detection. George was further protected by the grandfather, who bribed a Christian to adopt young Soros as a Godson. This man took George along with him on rounds to collect property left behind by those sent to concentration camps and their death.
Under that type of stress and society, Soros who was born in 1930 would have been in his 20’s, and showed little remorse for the literal grave robbing of his youth - comparing the horror of it all to economics. Freud would have had a field day with that one.
So, the young George Soros suffers from his past, psychologically, and then builds a financial empire but what of his political ideology? One also has to understand that the Russians who took Eastern Europe during WWII also installed communism as the governments ideology - Soros would have been a perfect target to indoctrinate. Therefore what we have is an emotionally scarred man, who most likely needs therapy, gladly following the Russian Marxist philosophy, while contrarily making hay with the free market system. The man is conflicted.
If Mr. Soros truly believes he can buy politicians, well there is good reason. One just needs to look at the bribery and other crimes that takes place in say, the Massachusetts State Legislature, which has seen more felony prone Speakers than any other United States. Soros just needed to find like minded – progressive socialist Marxist politicians in order to “effect change” – With the U.S. University Professors heavily enamored of a Russia (that failed) under Marxism, how difficult is the recruitment task?
Therefore, Soros has a core of true believers and the money to buy politicians and ad space in the New York Time, further speaking to the choir. The problem is that the choir is not huge, perhaps 20% of the populace of the U.S. might identify with Soros. Therefore, should Dr. Evil decide to remove Obama, and having the billions in wherewithal to do so, logic follows that as Obama has not met George’s expectations, Soros will fund a candidate to run against Obama in 2012.
It would be this carnival of reality political television (Obama versus the left of left) that not even Maureen Dowd would be able to spin with a straight face. The average American would run to the nearest available candidate that appeared to be even somewhat more sane than the aforementioned. This opens an opportunity for an ultra conservative, a Santorum for example, to waltz into the White House virtually unchallenged. (The drama of the political left, already disgusts the middle electorate, who would be pushed to the breaking in this scenario and elect Barry Goldwater’s Ghost in a heartbeat.) If one thought that the Tea Party had an impact on the last election, imagine 2012 under this hypothesis – a rout would not be a strong enough word to describe the results.
The only State either Barack Obama and/or Soros lite, would be able to count on would be Massachusetts, even if David Axelrod follows the Deval Patrick model for Barack and invites a third candidate (Democrat conveniently turned Independent) to run and try and split the vote, they would, with enough “Dream Act” participants (explains what happened in 2010 MA mid-terms), at least have that one blue State on an election map colored Scarlet red. This of course assumes that Obama even makes it through the Democrat primary should Soros really have the power to push a candidate more left of center than Obama to the top slot.
Therefore, Soros, who is pushing the limits of age and sanity, would become even less relevant than he is now, given the fact that the next President is likely to have two full terms (the historical odds). The Good news: surely, there would be another Soros or Soros-like crackpot to fill his shoes, ensuring that Beck’s books and appearances would continue to profit.
To get a glimpse into the mind of Dr. Evil Soros, a video clip is provided below, in which he explains in a variety of arenas on several different occasions, his “worldview” so to speak. In the meantime, if Beck were publicly traded, it would be suggested that one buy stocks in the man. Of the two, Beck is by far the savvier, and the least comedically dangerous.
No comments:
Post a Comment