Tehran: stuck between Baghdad and Kabul
According to Hamad Asefi, a spokesman for Tehran, Iran's nuclear enrichment program is "irreversible". (Latest Press here at Bloomberg.com). However, they are now considering some sort of limited inspections. Perhaps the pre-emptive writing is on the wall.
Did Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wake up and realize the following?
Israel's, especially of note, acting Prime Minister Olmert, believe him to be comparable to Hitler. Reuters
Mahmoud might have got a glimpse of the latest "peace" March in NYC (i.e. the Elite-Communist-Democrats-Hollywood find a 1000 or 3 gullible students to march to Bloomies and shop; they relish the day back in the 1960's when they were relevant and 100,000 would march).
"I'm Against the Next War?" These same messages have been spotted at every "peace" March held in New York: immediately following September 11, prior to any action against Afghanistan and more heated before action against Baghdad.
Which begs the question, was it by blunder or design or both that the world finds itself facing a nuclear capable, religiously insane, runaway regime and the United States finds itself in a unique position? In place, armed and resolved on both of Iran's borders.
"Never mind a ground campaign," "Those bases in Iraq and Afghanistan? They are for our convenience" "We're going to bomb the back to the stoneage" (anonymous internet and cafe quotes)
Saddam Hussein, like Mahmoud, also thought his friends in France, Germany and Russian were capable of halting any action by the American's and allow him to continue being crazy unabated.
One would think he would only need to look at Iraq for inspiration and a dose of reality.
Perhaps his "constituants" are considering just that.
No comments:
Post a Comment