Obama plans Two Vacations – First Family to Visit Gulf and Martha’s Vineyard – Media – He Attempts to Move to the Right?

Obama on the Cover of Time - media depiction as FDR, a call to moderates - who prefer Clinton

According to the the AFP President Barak Obama and his familyare planning two more vacations before summers end – one to the Gulf and one to Martha’s Vineyard. The Gulf vacation is family only, according the this Euro news service, and while in Louisiana the President also plans on mixing in a bit of “business” – visiting small businesses who may have been affected by the oil spill. The last summer vacation will be in Martha’s Vineyard.

This, despite, the fact that the nations unemployment rate remains steady at 9.5% with no change anticipated for August”, and appearances, as “they” say, are everything. Apparently, advisers must have suggested a get-away or two – not realizing that this move may not be the best way to endear the suffering populace. On the other hand, with Congress on recess, and embattled Democrats fighting to maintain their seats, it may have been a directive from the DNC to “get out of Dodge” and find something to do away from Washington and any Democrat that is up for reelection – as he is less effective, say than President Bill Clinton, who is the preferred “party star” to aid endangered Democrats (NPR). That said, at every opportunity, the President and Democrats in general, are still blaming President George Bush for every problem that occurs (including the Gulf Oil Spill), a man who was eviscerated by the media for taking vacations at a working ranch (owned by Bush), while a natural disaster was occurring (Katrina).

With a political party in hot water, it is, in all likelihood, a good idea for Obama to maintain a low profile, after all, 2012 campaigning also begins on November 3, 2010 – time for Obama to begin to “move to the middle” in order to maintain his current residence. This strategy is in place, according to Keith Koffer, in an op-ed found in Politico. Mr. Koffer cites the fact that White House Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, is “picking fights “with the left – on purpose. This purpose would be to apparently distant the President from those who are left of center – or the majority of the Democrat Congressional members. Seriously, the author goes so far as to compare Obama’s “strategy” to that of President Clinton’s in 1994. It is, without a doubt, disingenuous to think that a comparison can be made between the two men in the first place, and in the second, conditions in the country (unemployment, etc.) are simply not comparable.

If one were to compare President Obama to a past Democrat office holder, it would have to be Carter – not Clinton. This is not the first article (or salvo) fired off by the press, op-ed or no, that is claiming a “move to the center” by Obama, and quoting one comment found under the Politico article one can sense the hostility towards the press and the President and that fact that it is a “no-sale” theory:

“Oh please, he already pulled this crap once to get elected and as soon as he was elected he took a HARD left and hasn't been back!
I don't think Oblunder will be fooling anyone this time and he still is and always will be as radical as ever!”

Shades of the Who ”Won’t Get Fooled Again” .

It is not the vacations, necessarily; it is more the constant bailouts, the appearance that the President and his Congress in concert are oblivious to needs and wants of the general electorate, which will make it extremely difficult to imagine a second term. Of course, according to every article remotely critiquing the administration, there lurks a line or two about the “GOP” calling out the same for acting irresponsibly. In other words, still stumping for Obama, even though it is apparent this president’s chances of re-election are growing slimmer by the day.

What of Bill Clinton on the campaign trail? It serves two purposes, neither of which are tied to the current President. One, it puts a popular President out front with Democrats (Senate and Congress) who are most likely to face a loss, but will remember and support the Clintons, and does get the old base enthused. (Referring of course, to the old democrat, as opposed to the “progressives”). In addition, with Hillary Clinton perhaps the party’s only hope of maintaining Pennsylvania Avenue for the Democrats, its political capital in the bank- this despite the appearance of “helping” Obama.

All’s fair in love, war and politics, given that old adage, one cannot see a new majority (in both the Congress and the Senate) working against the opportunity to see a Republican in the White House – or a true moderate Democrat (i.e. Hillary Clinton). In addition, it is difficult to see this particular man, go against his personal progressive convictions, those that have been in place in the earliest moments of his political career(see below) – and may make any move, even remotely to the center, either transparently false, or impossible. ( From the New Party (Socialist Party):

Secondly, the NP's '96 Political Program has been enormously successful with 3 of 4 endorsed candidates winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NP membership meeting on April 11th to express their gratitude. Danny Davis, winner in the 7th Congressional District, invited NPers to join his Campaign Steering Committee. Patricia Martin, who won the race for
Judge in 7th Subcircuit Court, explained that due to the NP she was able to network and get experienced advice from progressives like Davis. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration.

)

Therefore, being the “brilliant” man he is, he must be aware of the mood of the populace, and the great lengths he must go through in order to attempt a political “makeover” in time and in concert with a sympathetic media, in a rally for a second term, which, pinning ones political hopes on the short memory of the average “American Idol” voter, may not be the best strategy this time around. The times have changed since Carter’s first and only term.

A Sign of the Time: Near Riots in Atlanta over Section 8 Vouchers – When Will Common Sense and Decency Prevail?

Crowd shown waiting for Section 8 Housing Application: image AJC.com

From the Atlanta Journal Constitution: A crowd estimated at 30,000 were on hand to pick up vouchers for Section 8 housing being distributed at a local Housing Authority office. Apparently, after standing for hours in the heat, some “cutting in line” resulted in some pushing and shoving, with the result of “riot police” being called to the scene. There were dozens of individuals requiring medical treatment due to the heat – one can, from the article, sense the heightened desperation of families who feel there is nowhere to turn, with the exception of the state.

With the amount of monies being thrown to institutions deemed “to big to fail”, (which is the normal ebb and flow of business), millions spent on signs touting the Government’s planned projects under the “Stimulus”, etc., one cannot help but wonder what other better uses that money may have been put to, in order to avoid this type of scenario. Perhaps a Franklin D. Roosevelt style of ‘workfare’, modified to include education and housing in order to give individuals a hand up, would have been in order.

Yet the trend continues, and as the administration passes spending bill after spending bill, there is a diminished tax base to support the bailouts of business as well as states who have shown the same lack of restraint when it comes to spending. A recent article in USA today, ranks government employees as earning twice the amount as someone doing the same job in the private sector.

While the “elite” are sustained, those who are considered the “masses” are being driven into the depths of poverty (Progressive think) – and those left to support them both (the middle class) must either pay increased taxes, (pushing them into poverty), or stop, by way of the ballot, the spending that is neither necessary or relevant, and which causes situations such as the one in Atlanta to occur. The time has come to put the ordinary citizen to the test, perhaps a candidate who has little experience, lacks a Harvard degree, but has worked in the private sector, or has been self-employed, might have more common sense than those who are expected to have the knowledge, “experience” and common sense, but obviously do not. In almost every district, in every state, from the individual statehouse to the Congress and Senate, there are challengers who fit this description and these men and women, may be the answer. To stay the current course, is obviously, not working and historically, has a record of failure.

From the Atlanta Journal Constitution: A crowd estimated at 30,000 were on hand to pick up vouchers for Section 8 housing being distributed at a local Housing Authority office. Apparently, after standing for hours in the heat, some “cutting in line” resulted in some pushing and shoving, with the result of “riot police” being called to the scene. There were dozens of individuals requiring medical treatment due to the heat – one can, from the article, sense the heightened desperation of families who feel there is nowhere to turn, with the exception of the state. With the amount of monies being thrown to institutions deemed “to big to fail”, (which is the normal ebb and flow of business), millions spent on signs touting the Government’s planned projects under the “Stimulus”, etc., one cannot help but wonder what other better uses that money may have been put to, in order to avoid this type of scenario. Perhaps a Franklin D. Roosevelt style of ‘workfare’, modified to include education and housing in order to give individuals a hand up, would have been in order. Yet, the trend continues, as the administration passes spending bill, after spending bill, with a diminished tax base to support the bailouts of business as well as states who have shown the same lack of restraint when it comes to spending. A recent article in USA today, ranks government employees as earning twice the amount as someone doing the same job in the private sector. While the “elite” are sustained, those who are considered the “masses” are being driven into the depths of poverty – and those left to support them both (the middle class) must either pay increased taxes, (pushing them into poverty), or stop, by way of the ballot, the spending that is neither necessary or relevant, and which causes situations such as the one in Atlanta to occur. The time has come to put the ordinary citizen to the test, perhaps a candidate who has little experience, lacks a Harvard degree, but has worked in the private sector, or has been self-employed, might have more common sense than those who are expected to have the knowledge, “experience” and common sense, but obviously do not. In almost every district, in every state, from the individual statehouse to the Congress and Senate, there are challengers who fit this description and these men and women, may be the answer. To stay the current course, is obviously, not working and historically, has a record of failure.

Sholley Beilat Mass. 4th District Republican Debate August 11, 2010 Audio

The following Audio Clips are the debate between Republican Candidates for the Massachusetts 4th District Congressional seat, Mr. Sean Bielat and Mr. Earl Sholley. They met this morning on the Jeff Katz Show, Rush Radio Boston. This is the only debate prior to the primary on September 14th, 2010. The winner of this primary will go on to face Barney Frank in November.


Part I



To listen to the second half of this interview go to: Rush Radio Boston.